Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Freeman v. U.S., No. 09-10245 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 522; 131 S.Ct. 2685) (June 23, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)

Loaded on June 27, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists June 27, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

This case involves the interrelationship between two different provisions of Federal Sentencing Law - namely Rule 11(c)(1)(C) of the Fed.R.Crim.P. and 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2).

Rule 11(c)(1)(C) is the provision that authorizes a defendant to enter into a Type C plea agreement, which permits the parties to “agree that a ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Tapia v. U.S., No. 10-5400 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 319; 131 S.Ct. 2382) (June 16, 2011) (Justice Kagan)
  2. Freeman v. U.S., No. 09-10245 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 522; 131 S.Ct. 2685) (June 23, 2011) (Justice Kennedy)
  3. Bullcoming v. New Mexico, No. 09-10876 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 647; 131 S.Ct. 2705) (June 23, 2011) (Justice Ginsburg)
  4. Davis v. U.S., No. 09-11328 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 229; 131 S.Ct. 2419) (June 16, 2011) (Justice Alito)
  5. J.D.B. v. North Carolina, No. 09-11121 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 261; 131 S.Ct. 2394) (June 16, 2011) (Justice Sotomayor)
  6. Turner v. Rogers, No. 10-10 (U.S. Supreme Court) (564 U.S. 431; 131 S.Ct. 2507) (June 20, 2011) (Justice Breyer)

More from these topics: