Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kulick, No. 09-3833 (3rd Cir.) (629 F.3d 165) (December 29, 2010) (Judge D. Michael Fisher)

Loaded on March 21, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists March 21, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Felon in Possession Statute.

Anytime a court limits the scope and reach of the ubiquitous and far-reaching tentacles of the Guidelines’ “relevant conduct” provisions, that is a noteworthy ruling. And that is precisely what the Third Circuit did in the instant case.

Relevant conduct, of course, is the controversial and novel sentencing weapon created …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Dobbs, No. 09-5025 (10th Cir.) (629 F.3d 1199) (January 5, 2011) (Judge Jerome A. Holmes)
  2. U.S. v. Tinnie, No. 09-4082 (7th Cir.) (629 F.3d 749) (January 18, 2011) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
  3. U.S. v. Fisher, No. 10-2352 (7th Cir.) (635 F.3d 336) (March 11, 2011) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
  4. U.S. v. Kohring, No. 08-30170 (9th Cir.) (637 F.3d 895) (March 11, 2011) (Judge Sidney R. Thomas)
  5. U.S. v. Kulick, No. 09-3833 (3rd Cir.) (629 F.3d 165) (December 29, 2010) (Judge D. Michael Fisher)
  6. Skinner v. Switzer, No. 09-9000 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 521; 131 S.Ct. 1289) (March 7, 2011) (Justice Ginsburg)
  7. Wall v. Kholi, No. 09-868 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 545; 131 S.Ct. 1278) (March 7, 2011) (Justice Alito)

More from these topics: