Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kulick, No. 09-3833 (3rd Cir.) (629 F.3d 165) (December 29, 2010) (Judge D. Michael Fisher)

Loaded on March 21, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists March 21, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Felon in Possession Statute.

Anytime a court limits the scope and reach of the ubiquitous and far-reaching tentacles of the Guidelines’ “relevant conduct” provisions, that is a noteworthy ruling. And that is precisely what the Third Circuit did in the instant case.

Relevant conduct, of course, is the controversial and novel sentencing weapon created ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Kohring, No. 08-30170 (9th Cir.) (637 F.3d 895) (March 11, 2011) (Judge Sidney R. Thomas)
  2. U.S. v. Tinnie, No. 09-4082 (7th Cir.) (629 F.3d 749) (January 18, 2011) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
  3. U.S. v. Dobbs, No. 09-5025 (10th Cir.) (629 F.3d 1199) (January 5, 2011) (Judge Jerome A. Holmes)
  4. U.S. v. Kulick, No. 09-3833 (3rd Cir.) (629 F.3d 165) (December 29, 2010) (Judge D. Michael Fisher)
  5. U.S. v. Fisher, No. 10-2352 (7th Cir.) (635 F.3d 336) (March 11, 2011) (Judge Terrence T. Evans)
  6. Skinner v. Switzer, No. 09-9000 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 521; 131 S.Ct. 1289) (March 7, 2011) (Justice Ginsburg)
  7. Wall v. Kholi, No. 09-868 (U.S. Supreme Court) (562 U.S. 545; 131 S.Ct. 1278) (March 7, 2011) (Justice Alito)

More from these topics: