Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Jackson, No. 09-1630 (6th Cir.) (635 F.3d 205) (March 24, 2011) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)

Loaded on May 2, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists May 02, 2011
Filed under: Due Process, Punch And Jurists.

Here the Court held that while U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8 prohibits the use of proffer statements in determining the applicable guideline range, there “appears to be" no similar ban on other uses of such statements such as determining the specific sentence.

Proffer agreements have long been the bane of many criminal ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Williams, No. CR 10-4083-2-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (788 F.Supp.2d 847) (April 7, 2011) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
  2. U.S. v. Goncalves, No. 10-1367 (1st Cir.) (642 F.3d 245) (April 28, 2011) (Judge Michael Boudin)
  3. U.S. v. Apodaca, No. 09-50372 (9th Cir.) (641 F.3d 1077) (April 12, 2011) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
  4. U.S. v. Bannister, No. 10-CR-0053 (E.D.N.Y.) (786 F.Supp.2d 617) (April 8, 2011) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  5. U.S. v. Burgum, No. 09-50449 (9th Cir.) (633 F.3d 810) (January 25, 2011) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
  6. U.S. v. Morris, No. 10-10009 (9th Cir.) (633 F.3d 885) (February 2, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  7. U.S. v. Slough, No. 10-3006 (D.C. Cir.) (641 F.3d 544) (April 22, 2011) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
  8. Esmail v. Obama, No. 10-5282 (D.C. Cir.) (639 F.3d 1075) (April 8, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  9. U.S. v. Lowe, No. 10-2832 (7th Cir.) (632 F.3d 996) (January 25, 2011) (Judge William J. Bauer)
  10. U.S. v. Jackson, No. 09-1630 (6th Cir.) (635 F.3d 205) (March 24, 2011) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)

More from these topics: