U.S. v. Jackson, No. 09-1630 (6th Cir.) (635 F.3d 205) (March 24, 2011) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
Loaded on May 2, 2011
published in Punch and Jurists
May 02, 2011
Filed under:
Due Process,
Punch And Jurists.
Here the Court held that while U.S.S.G. § 1B1.8 prohibits the use of proffer statements in determining the applicable guideline range, there “appears to be" no similar ban on other uses of such statements such as determining the specific sentence.
Proffer agreements have long been the bane of …
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login
More from this issue:
- U.S. v. Jackson, No. 09-1630 (6th Cir.) (635 F.3d 205) (March 24, 2011) (Judge Eugene E. Jr. Siler)
- U.S. v. Lowe, No. 10-2832 (7th Cir.) (632 F.3d 996) (January 25, 2011) (Judge William J. Bauer)
- Esmail v. Obama, No. 10-5282 (D.C. Cir.) (639 F.3d 1075) (April 8, 2011) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Slough, No. 10-3006 (D.C. Cir.) (641 F.3d 544) (April 22, 2011) (Judge Stephen F. Williams)
- U.S. v. Morris, No. 10-10009 (9th Cir.) (633 F.3d 885) (February 2, 2011) (Per Curiam)
- U.S. v. Burgum, No. 09-50449 (9th Cir.) (633 F.3d 810) (January 25, 2011) (Judge Raymond C. Fisher)
- U.S. v. Bannister, No. 10-CR-0053 (E.D.N.Y.) (786 F.Supp.2d 617) (April 8, 2011) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
- U.S. v. Apodaca, No. 09-50372 (9th Cir.) (641 F.3d 1077) (April 12, 2011) (Judge Richard D. Cudahy)
- U.S. v. Goncalves, No. 10-1367 (1st Cir.) (642 F.3d 245) (April 28, 2011) (Judge Michael Boudin)
- Williams, No. CR 10-4083-2-MWB (N.D.Iowa) (788 F.Supp.2d 847) (April 7, 2011) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
More from these topics:
- Most U.S. Prisoners Now Barred from Directly Receiving Physical Mail, Feb. 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail, Censorship, Warrantless Searches, Electronic Surveillance.
- HRDC Sues Minnesota DOC Over Censorship Policy, Feb. 1, 2026. Publications/Books, Due Process, Censorship, First Amendment, HRDC Litigation.
- United States Postal Service Declares Postmarks Could Be Delayed, Feb. 1, 2026. Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail, Access To Courts.
- Lawsuit Over Mailroom Abuses by Washington DOC Leads to Policy Changes, June 1, 2024. Retaliation for Litigating, Retaliation for Filing Grievances, Photos, Sexually Explicit Materials, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Legal Mail.
- Misadventures in Mail Censorship, Jan. 1, 2024. Administrative Exhaustion (PLRA), Grievances, Mail, Publications/Books, Mail Regulations, Due Process, Censorship, Prison Regulations.
- Eleventh Circuit Addresses First Amendment, Due Process Interests in Georgia Prisoner Emails, Jan. 1, 2024. Electronic Monitoring, Qualified Immunity, Due Process, First Amendment, rights, Attorney Misconduct/Disqualification, Email and IP Addresses, Prison Mail, Legitimate Penological Interests.
- Federal Judge Says Alaska DOC Policy Rejecting Prisoner Mail Without Notice Violates Due Process, Nov. 30, 2022. Due Process.
- Mailbox Rule Inapplicable to Prisoners Represented by Counsel, Oct. 1, 2021. Due Process, Legal Mail, Periods of Delay, Self-representation.
- Mattox v. U.S., No. 667 (U.S. Supreme Court) (156 U.S. 237; 15 S.Ct. 337) (February 4, 1995) (Justice Brown), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Confrontation Clause/Rights.
- Price v. Johnston, No. 111 (U.S. Supreme Court) (334 U.S. 266; 68 S.Ct. 1049) (May 24, 2048) (Justice Murphy), March 27, 2019. Punch And Jurists, Right to be Present.