U.S. v. Jacques, No. 09-cr-30001-MAP (D.Mass.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (May 17, 2011) (Judge Michael A. Ponsor)
Here the Court refused to permit expert testimony about false or coerced confessions after concluding that such testimony was inadmissible under the mandates of Fed.R.Evid. 702 and the standards established by Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals.
The defendant in this case, Michael Jacques, was arrested, charged and ultimately convicted at ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login