Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Spencer v. Roche, No. 11-1146 (1st Cir.) ( F.3d ) (October 18, 2011) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)

Loaded on Oct. 31, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists October 31, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, X-Ray Searches.

Court Holds That a Non-Consensual X-Ray of the Anal Cavity Does Not Violate the Fourth Amendment When the Police Have a Valid Search Warrant for a Body Search.

In the words of the Court, this case “raises interesting questions regarding the constitutional limits of searches conducted by the police with …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Motors Ins. Corp. v. U.S., No. 11-10875 (E.D.Mich.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (September 27, 2011) (Judge Avern Levin Cohn)
  2. U.S. v. Rivera, No. 10-1199-cr (2nd Cir.) (662 F.3d 166) (October 21, 2011) (Judge John Gleeson)
  3. Spencer v. Roche, No. 11-1146 (1st Cir.) ( F.3d ) (October 18, 2011) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  4. Mattos v. Agarano, No. 08-15567 (9th Cir.) (661 F.3d 433) (October 17, 2011) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
  5. U.S. v. Mackety, No. 09-2148 (6th Cir.) (650 F.3d 621) (June 17, 2011) (Judge Helene N. White)
  6. U.S. v. Tickles, No. 10-30852 (5th Cir.) (661 F.3d 212) (October 19, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  7. U.S. v. Mosley, No. 2:09-849 (D.N.J.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (April 27, 2011) (Judge William J. Martini)
  8. U.S. v. Rizk, No. 10-50051 (9th Cir.) (660 F.3d 1125) (October 19, 2011) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)

More from these topics: