Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Spencer v. Roche, No. 11-1146 (1st Cir.) ( F.3d ) (October 18, 2011) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)

Loaded on Oct. 31, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists October 31, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, X-Ray Searches.

Court Holds That a Non-Consensual X-Ray of the Anal Cavity Does Not Violate the Fourth Amendment When the Police Have a Valid Search Warrant for a Body Search.

In the words of the Court, this case “raises interesting questions regarding the constitutional limits of searches conducted by the police with ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Rizk, No. 10-50051 (9th Cir.) (660 F.3d 1125) (October 19, 2011) (Judge Ronald M. Gould)
  2. U.S. v. Mosley, No. 2:09-849 (D.N.J.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (April 27, 2011) (Judge William J. Martini)
  3. U.S. v. Tickles, No. 10-30852 (5th Cir.) (661 F.3d 212) (October 19, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  4. U.S. v. Mackety, No. 09-2148 (6th Cir.) (650 F.3d 621) (June 17, 2011) (Judge Helene N. White)
  5. Mattos v. Agarano, No. 08-15567 (9th Cir.) (661 F.3d 433) (October 17, 2011) (Judge Richard A. Paez)
  6. Spencer v. Roche, No. 11-1146 (1st Cir.) ( F.3d ) (October 18, 2011) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  7. U.S. v. Rivera, No. 10-1199-cr (2nd Cir.) (662 F.3d 166) (October 21, 2011) (Judge John Gleeson)
  8. Motors Ins. Corp. v. U.S., No. 11-10875 (E.D.Mich.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (September 27, 2011) (Judge Avern Levin Cohn)

More from these topics: