Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Aumais, No. 10-3160-cr (2nd Cir.) (656 F.3d 147) (September 8, 2011) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)

Loaded on Sept. 19, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists September 19, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Here the Court joined the majority of Circuits in holding that a victim of child pornography should not receive any restitution payments under 18 U.S.C. § 2259 from those who possessed images of that pornography but had no role in creating it.

Gerald Aumais pled guilty to transporting and possessing …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Bristol, No. 10-CR-36 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (819 F.Supp.2d 135) (September 2, 2011) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
  2. Floyd v. City of New York, No. 08 Civ. 1034(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (813 F.Supp.2d 417) (August 31, 2011) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
  3. U.S. v. Aumais, No. 10-3160-cr (2nd Cir.) (656 F.3d 147) (September 8, 2011) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
  4. Rush v. City of Mansfield, No. 1:07-CV-1068 (N.D.Ohio) (771 F.Supp.2d 827) (February 11, 2011) (Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley)
  5. U.S. v. Santini, No. 10-50391 (9th Cir.) (656 F.3d 1075) (September 8, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Rodgers, No. 10-30254 (9th Cir.) (656 F.3d 1023) (September 7, 2011) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

More from these topics: