Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Rodgers, No. 10-30254 (9th Cir.) (656 F.3d 1023) (September 7, 2011) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

Loaded on Sept. 19, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists September 19, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Probable Cause.

In this automobile search case, a divided panel from the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s refusal to grant a motion to suppress evidence of a gun and drugs found in the car on the grounds that the district court failed to make “an important distinction between probable cause to …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Bristol, No. 10-CR-36 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (819 F.Supp.2d 135) (September 2, 2011) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
  2. Floyd v. City of New York, No. 08 Civ. 1034(SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (813 F.Supp.2d 417) (August 31, 2011) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
  3. U.S. v. Aumais, No. 10-3160-cr (2nd Cir.) (656 F.3d 147) (September 8, 2011) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
  4. Rush v. City of Mansfield, No. 1:07-CV-1068 (N.D.Ohio) (771 F.Supp.2d 827) (February 11, 2011) (Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley)
  5. U.S. v. Santini, No. 10-50391 (9th Cir.) (656 F.3d 1075) (September 8, 2011) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Rodgers, No. 10-30254 (9th Cir.) (656 F.3d 1023) (September 7, 2011) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

More from these topics: