Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Chang Hong, No. 10-6294 (10th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (August 30, 2011) (Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich)

Loaded on Sept. 5, 2011 published in Punch and Jurists September 05, 2011
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Post Padilla v. Kentucky.

Here the Court held that the Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Padilla v. Kentucky established a “new rule of law” and therefore cannot be applied retroactively on collateral review - thus disagreeing with the 3rd Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. Orocio.

Chaidez v. U.S., 655 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. Aug. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Chaidez v. U.S., No. 10-3623 (7th Cir.) (655 F.3d 684) (August 23, 2011) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
  2. U.S. v. Holcomb, No. 11-1558 (7th Cir.) (657 F.3d 445) (August 24, 2011) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  3. U.S. v. Flowers, No. 10-20149 (E.D.Mich.) (768 F.Supp.2d 922) (February 17, 2011) (Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff)
  4. U.S. v. Freeman, No. 09-4043 (7th Cir.) (650 F.3d 673) (June 17, 2011) (Judge Daniel A. Manion)
  5. U.S. v. Shaygan, No. 09-20112 (11th Cir.) (652 F.3d 1297) (August 29, 2011) (Judge William H. Jr. Pryor)
  6. U.S. v. Chang Hong, No. 10-6294 (10th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (August 30, 2011) (Judge Timothy M. Tymkovich)
  7. Glik v. Cunniffe, No. 10-1764 (1st Cir.) (655 F.3d 78) (August 26, 2011) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
  8. U.S. v. Gustin, No. 10-2761 (7th Cir.) (642 F.3d 573) (June 7, 2011) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  9. In Re U.S., No. 10-MC-897 (NGG) (E.D.N.Y.) (809 F.Supp.2d 113) (August 22, 2011) (Judge Nicholas G. Garaufis)
  10. U.S. v. Martinez, No. 10-2070 (10th Cir.) (643 F.3d 1292) (July 12, 2011) (Judge Stephanie K. Seymour)

More from these topics: