Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Sanders, No. 10-13667 (11th Cir.) (668 F.3d 1298) (February 2, 2012) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on April 16, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists April 16, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Remoteness in Time.

Here the Court held that the district court had abused its discretion and violated the precepts of Rule 404(b) by allowing the admission of evidence of the defendant’s 22-year-old dissimilar conviction - but deemed the error harmless.

In 1988, Walter Sanders, the defendant in the instant case, was convicted of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Florence v. Board of Freeholders, No. 10-945 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 318; 132 S.Ct. 1510) (April 2, 2012) (Justice Kennedy)
  2. U.S. v. Vizcarra, No. 09-1174 (7th Cir.) (668 F.3d 516) (February 7, 2012) (Judge Diane S. Sykes)
  3. U.S. v. Dossie, No. 11-CR-236 (JG) (E.D.N.Y.) (851 F.Supp.2d 478) (March 30, 2012) (Judge John Gleeson)
  4. U.S. v. Major, No. 10-10147 (9th Cir.) (676 F.3d 803) (March 27, 2012) (Judge J. Clifford Wallace)
  5. Wagner v. County of Maricopa, No. 10-15501 (9th Cir.) (673 F.3d 977) (March 7, 2012) (Judge John T. Jr. Noonan)
  6. Rehberg v. Paulk, No. 10-788 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 356; 132 S.Ct. 1497) (April 2, 2012) (Justice Alito)
  7. U.S. v. Sanders, No. 10-13667 (11th Cir.) (668 F.3d 1298) (February 2, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  8. U.S. v. Boros, No. 10-2566 (7th Cir.) (668 F.3d 901) (February 9, 2012) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)

More from these topics: