Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Martinez v. Ryan, No. 10-1001 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 1; 132 S.Ct. 1309) (March 20, 2012) (Justice Kennedy)

Loaded on April 2, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists April 02, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Here a sharply divided held that a federal habeas court may excuse a procedural default of an ineffective-assistance claim when the claim was not properly presented in state court due to an attorney’s errors in an initial-review collateral proceeding.

This is another highly fact-specific Supreme Court habeas corpus decision that ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Missouri v. Frye, No. 10-444 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 134; 132 S.Ct. 1399) (March 21, 2012) (Justice Kennedy)
  2. Lafler v. Cooper, No. 10-209 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 156; 132 S.Ct. 1376) (March 21, 2012) (Justice Kennedy)
  3. Martinez v. Ryan, No. 10-1001 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 1; 132 S.Ct. 1309) (March 20, 2012) (Justice Kennedy)
  4. U.S. v. Ressam, No. 09-30000 (9th Cir.) (679 F.3d 1069) (March 12, 2012) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  5. U.S. v. Wali, No. 3:10-CR-235-L (N.D.Tex.) (811 F.Supp.2d 1276) (March 3, 2011) (Judge Sam A. Lindsay)
  6. Setser v. U.S., No. 10-7387 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 231; 132 S.Ct. 1463) (March 28, 2012) (Justice Scalia)
  7. Credit Suisse Securities v. Simmonds, No. 10-1261 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 221; 132 S.Ct. 1414) (March 26, 2012) (Justice Scalia)
  8. Vartelas v. Holder, No. 10-1211 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 257; 132 S.Ct. 1479) (March 28, 2012) (Justice Ginsburg)

More from these topics: