Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Owens, No. 10-15877 (11th Cir.) (682 F.3d 1358) (June 8, 2012) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Aug. 20, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists August 20, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Expert and Opinion Evidence/Testimony.

Despite the Supreme Court’s recent refusal to establish a new rule requiring courts to evaluate eyewitness evidence made in a suggestive setting before it is submitted to the jury (see, Perry v. New Hampshire, 565 U.S. ___, 132 S.Ct. 176 (2012)), the reliability of eyewitness testimony remains the grist of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Mahaffy, No. 09-5349-cr(L) (2nd Cir.) (693 F.3d 113) (August 2, 2012) (Judge Barrington D. Jr. Parker)
  2. U.S. v. Reibel, No. 11-3416 (7th Cir.) (688 F.3d 868) (August 6, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  3. U.S. v. Burwell, No. 06-3070 (D.C. Cir.) (690 F.3d 500) (August 3, 2012) (Judge Janice Rogers Brown)
  4. U.S. v. Neff, No. 10-3336 (10th Cir.) (681 F.3d 1135) (June 5, 2012) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)
  5. U.S. v. Owens, No. 10-15877 (11th Cir.) (682 F.3d 1358) (June 8, 2012) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: