Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Smith v. Bank of America Corp., No. 11-CV-6368 (E.D.N.Y.) (865 F.Supp.2d 298) (May 18, 2012) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)

Loaded on Dec. 24, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists December 24, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Conflicting Provisions.

This is an interesting decision by Judge Weinstein that addresses some of the often murky contours and legal consequences of New York’s Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (ACD) program that is authorized by N.Y. Crim. Proc. Law 170.55. As Judge Weinstein observed in this decision, the “much-admired” purpose of the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Duval, No. 11-20594 (E.D.Mich.) (865 F.Supp.2d 803) (March 30, 2012) (Judge David M. Lawson)
  2. U.S. v. Trujillo-Castillon, No. 11-2646 (7th Cir.) (692 F.3d 575) (August 14, 2012) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
  3. U.S. v. Craig, No. 12-1262 (7th Cir.) (703 F.3d 1001) (December 18, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  4. Smith v. Bank of America Corp., No. 11-CV-6368 (E.D.N.Y.) (865 F.Supp.2d 298) (May 18, 2012) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  5. U.S. v. Duenas, No. 09-10492 (9th Cir.) (691 F.3d 1070) (August 16, 2012) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
  6. Moore v. Madigan, No. 12-1788 (7th Cir.) (702 F.3d 933) (December 11, 2012) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

More from these topics: