Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Duenas, No. 09-10492 (9th Cir.) (691 F.3d 1070) (August 16, 2012) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)

Loaded on Dec. 24, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists December 24, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Exclusionary Rule.

This decision recalls some of the many great “Perp-Walk” decisions of the past, where courageous judges have sometimes taken strong stands against the odious and outrageous (but frequently repeated) practice of prosecutors and law enforcement officials, at both the state and Federal levels, in organizing elaborately staged arrest scenes for ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Duval, No. 11-20594 (E.D.Mich.) (865 F.Supp.2d 803) (March 30, 2012) (Judge David M. Lawson)
  2. U.S. v. Trujillo-Castillon, No. 11-2646 (7th Cir.) (692 F.3d 575) (August 14, 2012) (Judge Ann Claire Williams)
  3. U.S. v. Craig, No. 12-1262 (7th Cir.) (703 F.3d 1001) (December 18, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  4. Smith v. Bank of America Corp., No. 11-CV-6368 (E.D.N.Y.) (865 F.Supp.2d 298) (May 18, 2012) (Judge Jack B. Weinstein)
  5. U.S. v. Duenas, No. 09-10492 (9th Cir.) (691 F.3d 1070) (August 16, 2012) (Judge Kim McLane Wardlaw)
  6. Moore v. Madigan, No. 12-1788 (7th Cir.) (702 F.3d 933) (December 11, 2012) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

More from these topics: