Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

National Immigration Project v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, No. 11 civ. 3235 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (February 7, 2012) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)

Loaded on Feb. 20, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists February 20, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Policy versus Practice.

Continuing his penchant for embarrassing the Government, the indefatigable District Judge Jed Rakoff of the S.D.N.Y. has openly challenged the trustworthiness of the Office of the Solicitor General of the United States (OSG) by suggesting that it may have deliberately misled the United States Supreme Court about the Administration’s immigration ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. National Immigration Project v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, No. 11 civ. 3235 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (February 7, 2012) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
  2. U.S. v. Inman, No. 10-5702 (6th Cir.) (666 F.3d 1001) (February 7, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  3. In Re Special Proceedings, No. 09-0198 (EGS) (D.D.C.) (842 F.Supp.2d 232) (February 8, 2012) (Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)
  4. U.S. v. McGarity, No. 09-12070 (11th Cir.) (669 F.3d 1218) (February 6, 2012) (Judge Peter T. Fay)
  5. U.S. v. Rosales-Garcia, No. 10-4224 (10th Cir.) (667 F.3d 1348) (February 7, 2012) (Judge William J. Jr. Holloway)
  6. Rodriguez v. Holder, No. 06-74444 (9th Cir.) (668 F.3d 670) (February 6, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  7. U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 11-15025 (9th Cir.) (669 F.3d 974) (January 25, 2012) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)

More from these topics: