Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Inman, No. 10-5702 (6th Cir.) (666 F.3d 1001) (February 7, 2012) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Feb. 20, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists February 20, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Lifetime Supervision.

The Federal Sentencing Guidelines are littered with examples of a near-frenzied effort by the Sentencing Commission and/or Congress to impose the maximum possible punishment on all sex offenders, regardless of the specific sentencing factors listed in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). One such example is the Policy Statement set forth at ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. National Immigration Project v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, No. 11 civ. 3235 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (February 7, 2012) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
  2. U.S. v. Inman, No. 10-5702 (6th Cir.) (666 F.3d 1001) (February 7, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  3. In Re Special Proceedings, No. 09-0198 (EGS) (D.D.C.) (842 F.Supp.2d 232) (February 8, 2012) (Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)
  4. U.S. v. McGarity, No. 09-12070 (11th Cir.) (669 F.3d 1218) (February 6, 2012) (Judge Peter T. Fay)
  5. U.S. v. Rosales-Garcia, No. 10-4224 (10th Cir.) (667 F.3d 1348) (February 7, 2012) (Judge William J. Jr. Holloway)
  6. Rodriguez v. Holder, No. 06-74444 (9th Cir.) (668 F.3d 670) (February 6, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  7. U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 11-15025 (9th Cir.) (669 F.3d 974) (January 25, 2012) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)

More from these topics: