Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. McGarity, No. 09-12070 (11th Cir.) (669 F.3d 1218) (February 6, 2012) (Judge Peter T. Fay)

Loaded on Feb. 20, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists February 20, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Here the Court clarified an earlier ruling held that, while restitution can be awarded under § 2259(c) against a mere possessor of child pornography, it can only be ordered when the Government can demonstrate proximate causation of harm to the victim.

This mammoth, 130-page decision addressed a plethora of issues …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Gonzalez, No. 11-15025 (9th Cir.) (669 F.3d 974) (January 25, 2012) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
  2. Rodriguez v. Holder, No. 06-74444 (9th Cir.) (668 F.3d 670) (February 6, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  3. U.S. v. Rosales-Garcia, No. 10-4224 (10th Cir.) (667 F.3d 1348) (February 7, 2012) (Judge William J. Jr. Holloway)
  4. U.S. v. McGarity, No. 09-12070 (11th Cir.) (669 F.3d 1218) (February 6, 2012) (Judge Peter T. Fay)
  5. In Re Special Proceedings, No. 09-0198 (EGS) (D.D.C.) (842 F.Supp.2d 232) (February 8, 2012) (Judge Emmet G. Sullivan)
  6. U.S. v. Inman, No. 10-5702 (6th Cir.) (666 F.3d 1001) (February 7, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  7. National Immigration Project v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security, No. 11 civ. 3235 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (February 7, 2012) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)

More from these topics: