Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Prosperi, No. 10-1739 (1st Cir.) (686 F.3d 32) (July 13, 2012) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)

Loaded on July 23, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists July 23, 2012
Filed under: Probation, Punch And Jurists.

Here the Court affirmed, as substantively reasonable, sentences of probation imposed on two white collar defendants convicted of fraud in Boston's Big Dig project despite a Guidelines’ sentencing range of 87 to 108 months.

This decision is a veritable sentencing banquet for anyone seeking support for huge below-the Guidelines sentence ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Patel v. City of Los Angeles, No. 08-56567 (9th Cir.) (686 F.3d 1085) (July 17, 2012) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  2. U.S. v. Vanderwerff, No. 12-CR-00069 (D.Colo.) (2012 u.s. Dist. LEXIS 89812) (June 28, 2012) (Judge John L. Jr. Kane)
  3. U.S. v. Prosperi, No. 10-1739 (1st Cir.) (686 F.3d 32) (July 13, 2012) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
  4. U.S. v. Ouedraogo, No. 1:08-cr-68 (W.D.Mich.) (837 F.Supp.2d 720) (December 21, 2011) (Judge Janet T. Neff)
  5. U.S. v. Burgess, No. 09-4584 (4th Cir.) (684 F.3d 445) (July 11, 2012) (Judge Barbara Milano Keenan)
  6. U.S. v. Olvera, No. 11-10793 (5th Cir.) (687 F.3d 645) (July 10, 2012) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: