Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Williams v. Illinois, No. 10-8505 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 50; 132 S.Ct. 2221) (June 18, 2012) (Justice Alito)

Loaded on June 25, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists June 25, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Testimonial Statements.

The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment provides that in all criminal cases, a defendant has the right “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” Prior to 2004, the Supreme Court took the view that the Confrontation Clause did not bar the admission of out-of-court statements that fell within ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Dorsey v. U.S., No. 11-5683 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 260; 132 S.Ct. 2321) (June 21, 2012) (Justice Breyer)
  2. Williams v. Illinois, No. 10-8505 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 50; 132 S.Ct. 2221) (June 18, 2012) (Justice Alito)
  3. Miller v. Alabama, No. 10-9646 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 460; 132 S.Ct. 2455) (June 25, 2012) (Justice Kagan)
  4. U.S. v. Wilson, No. 06-20290 (E.D.Mich.) (827 F.Supp.2d 747) (August 24, 2011) (Judge Lawrence P. Zatkoff)
  5. U.S. v. Figueroa, No. 11-2594 (7th Cir.) (682 F.3d 694) (June 11, 2012) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  6. Southern Union Company v. U.S., No. 11-94 (U.S. Supreme Court) (567 U.S. 342; 132 S.Ct. 2344) (June 21, 2012) (Justice Sotomayor)

More from these topics: