Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Holder v. Gutierrez, No. 10-1542 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 583; 132 S.Ct. 1542) (May 21, 2012) (Justice Kagan)

Loaded on May 28, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists May 28, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Eligibility Criteria.

Here the Court that the BIA’s interpretation of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a) - namely that an alien seeking cancellation of removal must individually satisfy the residency requirements of that statute - was “a permissible construction of the statute”.

The issue before the Court in these two companion cases was whether ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Blueford v. Arkansas, No. 10-1320 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 599; 132 S.Ct. 2041) (May 24, 2012) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
  2. Prude v. Clarke, No. 11-2811 (7th Cir.) (675 F.3d 732) (March 27, 2012) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  3. U.S. v. Whitney, No. 10-10118 (9th Cir.) (673 F.3d 965) (March 7, 2012) (Judge Stephen Reinhardt)
  4. Hedges v. Obama, No. 12 Civ. 331(KBF) (S.D.N.Y.) (2012 WL 2044565) (May 16, 2012) (Judge Katherine B. Forrest)
  5. Holder v. Gutierrez, No. 10-1542 (U.S. Supreme Court) (566 U.S. 583; 132 S.Ct. 1542) (May 21, 2012) (Justice Kagan)
  6. U.S. v. Aleo, No. 10-1569 (6th Cir.) (681 F.3d 290) (May 15, 2012) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)
  7. Floyd v. City of New York, No. 08 Civ. 1034 (SAS) (S.D.N.Y.) (283 F.R.D. 153) (May 16, 2012) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
  8. ACLU v. Alvarez, No. 11-1286 (7th Cir.) (679 F.3d 583) (May 8, 2012) (Judge Diane S. Sykes)

More from these topics: