Skip navigation

U.S. v. Aleo, No. 10-1569 (6th Cir.) (681 F.3d 290) (May 15, 2012) (Judge Danny J. Boggs)

Here, the Court vacated a 720 month sentence imposed on a defendant for child pornography finding the sentence was substantively unreasonable, in part because the failure of the court to offer any “compelling justifications” for the variance.

Craig Aleo, a 66-year old grandfather, was identified, in October 2006, by agents ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login