Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Zauner, No. 12-1007 (8th Cir.) (688 F.3d 426) (August 16, 2012) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)

Loaded on Nov. 12, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists November 12, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Parsimony Principle or Clause.

This case is noted for Judge Bright's dissent in which he argued that an 18 year sentence for child pornography was both excessive and erroneous because it was not sufficiently based on a careful assessment of the sentencing requirements of ยง 3553(a).

Donna Mary Zauner pled guilty to production of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Sowards, No. 10-4133 (4th Cir.) (690 F.3d 583) (June 25, 2012) (Judge James A. Jr. Wynn)
  2. U.S. v. Spencer, No. 11-3463 (8th Cir.) (700 F.3d 317) (November 7, 2012) (Judge Steven M. Colloton)
  3. U.S. v. Gupta, No. 11 Cr. 907 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y.) (904 F.Supp.2d 349) (October 24, 2012) (Judge Jed S. Rakoff)
  4. U.S. v. Zauner, No. 12-1007 (8th Cir.) (688 F.3d 426) (August 16, 2012) (Judge Diana E. Murphy)
  5. U.S. v. White, No. 11-2150 (7th Cir.) (698 F.3d 1005) (October 26, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Palomar-Martinez, No. 2:11-cr-156-MEF (M.D.Ala.) (858 F.Supp.2d 1281) (May 2, 2012) (Judge Mark E. Fuller)

More from these topics: