Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

In re: Amy Unknown, No. 09-41238 (5th Cir.) (701 F.3d 749) (November 19, 2012) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)

Loaded on Oct. 15, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists October 15, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

This case is about the proper interpretation of the Federal Mandatory Restitution for Sexual Exploitation of Children Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2259 (herein the “§ 2259”) - a law enacted in 1994 which made it mandatory for the Federal courts ro order restitution for victims of certain specified child-pornography crimes. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Dooley, No. 11-2256 (7th Cir.) (688 F.3d 318) (July 27, 2012) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  2. U.S. v. Davis, No. 11-6301 (4th Cir.) (689 F.3d 349) (July 23, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  3. U.S. v. Budziak, No. 11-10223 (9th Cir.) (697 F.3d 1105) (October 5, 2012) (Judge A. Wallace Tashima)
  4. In re: Amy Unknown, No. 09-41238 (5th Cir.) (701 F.3d 749) (November 19, 2012) (Judge Emilio M. Garza)
  5. U.S. v. Begin, No. 11-3896 (3rd Cir.) (696 F.3d 405) (October 9, 2012) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)
  6. U.S. v. Beasley, No. 11-2460 (8th Cir.) (688 F.3d 523) (July 31, 2012) (Judge William J. Riley)

More from these topics: