Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Rangel, No. 11-50062 (9th Cir.) (697 F.3d 795) (October 15, 2012) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)

Loaded on Oct. 29, 2012 published in Punch and Jurists October 29, 2012
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Poverty of the Defendant.

This amended decision raises (but virtually ignores) lots of interesting questions about whether the district court imposed a significantly higher sentence on the defendant because he could not pay any restitution to the victims of his massive Ponzi scheme.

Defendant Juan Rangel pled guilty, pursuant to a written plea agreement, ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Young v. Conway, No. 11-830-pr (2nd Cir.) (698 F.3d 69) (October 16, 2012) (Judge Barrington D. Jr. Parker)
  2. U.S. v. Rangel, No. 11-50062 (9th Cir.) (697 F.3d 795) (October 15, 2012) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)
  3. U.S. v. Quinn, No. 12-2260 (7th Cir.) (698 F.3d 651) (October 18, 2012) (Judge Frank H. Easterbrook)
  4. National Rifle Association v. B.A.T.F., No. 11-10959 (5th Cir.) (700 F.3d 184) (October 25, 2012) (Judge Edward C. Prado)
  5. Doe v. Nebraska, No. 8:09CV456 (D.Neb.) (898 F.Supp.2d 1086) (October 17, 2012) (Judge Richard G. Kopf)
  6. U.S. v. Lara, No. 11-3850 (8th Cir.) (690 F.3d 1079) (August 31, 2012) (Judge William Duane Benton)
  7. Hamdan v, U.S., No. 11-1257 (D.C. Cir.) (696 F.3d 1238) (October 16, 2012) (Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh)

More from these topics: