Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Jennings, No. 11-50315 (9th Cir.) (711 F.3d 1144) (April 3, 2013) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)

Loaded on April 29, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists April 29, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

Here the Court approved a two-level enhancement for “sophisticated means” in a tax fraud case, after concluding that the offense conduct “need not involve highly complex schemes or exhibit exceptional brilliance" to justify the enhancement.

This is another of a string of recent rulings that suggests it doesn’t take much ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. S.E.C. v. CR Intrinsic Investors, LLC, No. 12 Civ. 8466(VM) (S.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (April 16, 2012) (Judge Victor Marrero)
  2. Missouri v. McNeely, No. 11-1425 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 141; 133 S.Ct. 1552) (April 17, 2013) (Justice Sotomayor)
  3. U.S. v. Douglas, No. 11-5384-cr (2nd Cir.) (713 F.3d 694) (April 15, 2013) (Judge Gerard E. Lynch)
  4. Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., No. 10-1491 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 108; 133 S.Ct. 1659) (April 17, 2013) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
  5. Moncrieffe v. Holder, No. 11-702 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 184; 133 S.Ct. 1678) (April 23, 2013) (Justice Sotomayor)
  6. U.S. v. Jennings, No. 11-50315 (9th Cir.) (711 F.3d 1144) (April 3, 2013) (Judge Richard R. Clifton)

More from these topics: