Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Shmuckler, No. 1:11cr344 (LMB) (E.D.Va.) (911 F.Supp.2d 362) (December 17, 2012) (Judge Leonie M. Brinkema)

Loaded on Aug. 12, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists August 12, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Differences between sentencing and Guidelines purposes.

This is an interesting restitution decision which discusses some creative and challenging issues and arguments about the correlation between the calculation of losses for Guidelines purposes and the calculation of losses for restitution purposes.

The case is also a good example of (a) the Government’s use of a simple bait-and-switch ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. In Re: Application for Cell Site Data, No. 11-20884 (5th Cir.) (724 F.3d 600) (July 30, 2013) (Judge Edith Brown Clement)
  2. U.S. v. Shmuckler, No. 1:11cr344 (LMB) (E.D.Va.) (911 F.Supp.2d 362) (December 17, 2012) (Judge Leonie M. Brinkema)
  3. U.S. v. Lira, No. 11-30324 (9th Cir.) (725 F.3d 1043) (August 2, 2013) (Judge Morgan Christen)
  4. Hawkins v. U.S., No. 11-1245 (2nd Cir.) (724 F.3d 915) (July 31, 2013) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  5. U.S. v. Herrmann, No. 1:10cr91 (E.D.Va.) (910 F.Supp.2d 844) (November 20, 2012) (Judge Thomas Selby III Ellis)
  6. Brown v. Plata, No. 13A57 (U.S. Supreme Court) (570 U.S. 938; 134 S.Ct. 1) (August 2, 2013) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: