Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Newhouse, No. 11-3030-MWB (N.D.Iowa) ( F.Supp.2d ) (January 30, 2013) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)

Loaded on Feb. 18, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists February 18, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Lack of Empirical Support for Guidelines Sentence.

In this memorable, 68-page long Sentencing Memorandum, Judge Bennett set forth his reasons for imposing a 96-month sentence on Lori Newhouse, “a low-level pill smurfer” who was indicted for manufacturing or attempting to manufacture five grams of more of pure methamphetamine.

While Judge Bennett acknowledged that a 96-month sentence “is ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Howley, No. 11-6040 (6th Cir.) (707 F.3d 575) (February 4, 2013) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  2. U.S. v. Hilton, No. 11-4273 (4th Cir.) (701 F.3d 959) (December 13, 2012) (Judge Barbara Milano Keenan)
  3. Bailey v. Pataki, No. 10-2563 (2nd Cir.) (708 F.3d 391) (February 14, 2013) (Judge Robert D. Sack)
  4. U.S. v. Newhouse, No. 11-3030-MWB (N.D.Iowa) ( F.Supp.2d ) (January 30, 2013) (Judge Mark W. Bennett)
  5. U.S. v. Lumbard, No. 12-1209 (6th Cir.) (706 F.3d 716) (February 7, 2013) (Judge Curtis L. Collier)
  6. U.S. v. Peppel, No. 11-4327 (6th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (February 15, 2013) (Judge Karen Nelson Moore)

More from these topics: