Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Petri, No. 11-30337 (9th Cir.) (731 F.3d 833) (April 12, 2013) (Judge Richard C. Tallman)

Loaded on Feb. 18, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists August 11, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Factual Disputes/Findings.

In its opening paragraph, the Court framed the issue before it as follows: “A full decade after an amendment to Rule 32 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, we are asked for the first time to determine whether the amendment represented a vast expansion of the district court's fact-finding ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Castro-Verdugo, No. 13-50386 (9th Cir.) (750 F.3d 1065) (May 6, 2014) (Judge Susan P. Graber)
  2. Palmer v. District of Columbia, No. 1:09-CV-1482 (D.D.C.) (59 F.Supp.3d 173) (July 24, 2014) (Judge Frederick J. Jr. Scullin)
  3. U.S. v. Grigsby, No. 13-3146 (10th Cir.) (749 F.3d 908) (April 15, 2014) (Judge Bobby R. Baldock)
  4. Wollschlaeger v. Gov. of the State of Florida, No. 12-14009 (11th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (July 25, 2014) (Judge Gerald B. Tjoflat)
  5. U.S. v. Petri, No. 11-30337 (9th Cir.) (731 F.3d 833) (April 12, 2013) (Judge Richard C. Tallman)

More from these topics: