Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Juan, No. 11-10539 (9th Cir.) (704 F.3d 1137) (January 7, 2013) (Judge Milan D. Jr. Smith)

Loaded on Jan. 18, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists January 21, 2013
Filed under: Due Process, Punch And Jurists.

It has long been clear that, if the Government threatens a defense witness with perjury, such intimidation is usually deemed to be a due process violation. (See, e.g., Webb v. Texas, 409 U.S. 95 (1972).) This case raises a corollary issue - namely, whether the government's substantial interference with the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Smith v. U.S., No. 11-8976 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 106; 133 S.Ct. 714) (January 9, 2013) (Justice Scalia)
  2. Ryan v. Gonzales, No. 10-930 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 57; 133 S.Ct. 696) (January 8, 2013) (Justice Thomas)
  3. Mousovi v. Obama, No. Cic. No. 05-1124 (RMC) (D.D.C.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (January 9, 2013) (Judge Rosemary M. Collyer)
  4. Ligon v. City of New York, No. 12 Civ. 2274 (S.D.N.Y.) (925 F.Supp.2d 478) (January 8, 2013) (Judge Shira A. Scheindlin)
  5. U.S. v. Juan, No. 11-10539 (9th Cir.) (704 F.3d 1137) (January 7, 2013) (Judge Milan D. Jr. Smith)
  6. Turkmen v. Ashcroft, No. 02-CV-2307 (E.D.N.Y.) (915 F.Supp.2d 314) (January 15, 2013) (Judge John Gleeson)

More from these topics: