Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Davila, No. 12-167 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 597; 133 S.Ct. 2139) (June 13, 2013) (Justice Ginsburg)

Loaded on July 1, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists July 01, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Harmless Error.

This decision involved the interrelationship of two provisions of Rule 11 of the Fed.R.Crim.P., which governs guilty pleas. Rule 11(c)(1) states that “[t]he court must not participate in [plea] discussions.” Rule 11(h), in turn, states: “A variance from the requirements of th[e] rule is harmless error if it does not ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Alleyne v. U.S., No. 11-9335 (U.S. Supreme Court) (570 U.S. 99; 133 S.Ct. 2151) (June 17, 2013) (Justice Thomas)
  2. Salinas v. Texas, No. 12-246 (U.S. Supreme Court) (570 U.S. 178; 133 S.Ct. 2174) (June 17, 2013) (Justice Alito)
  3. U.S. v. Kebodeaux, No. 12-418 (U.S. Supreme Court) (570 U.S. 387; 133 S.Ct. 2496) (June 24, 2013) (Justice Breyer)
  4. Peugh v. U.S., No. 12-62 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 530; 133 S.Ct. 2072) (June 10, 2013) (Justice Sotomayor)
  5. Descamps v. U.S., No. 11-9540 (U.S. Supreme Court) (570 U.S. 254; 133 S.Ct. 2276) (June 20, 2013) (Justice Kagan)
  6. U.S. v. Davila, No. 12-167 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 597; 133 S.Ct. 2139) (June 13, 2013) (Justice Ginsburg)

More from these topics: