Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Chaidez v. U.S., No. 11-820 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 342; 133 S.Ct. 1103) (February 20, 2013) (Justice Kagan)

Loaded on March 18, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists March 04, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Post Padilla v. Kentucky.

In 2010, the Supreme Court issued a blockbuster ruling which held that a Sixth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim could be based on a defense counsel’s failure to inform his client of the possible immigration consequences, such as deportation, that could result by entering a guilty plea. (See, Padilla ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Florida v. Harris, No. 11-817 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 237; 133 S.Ct. 1050) (February 19, 2013) (Justice Kagan)
  2. Chaidez v. U.S., No. 11-820 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 342; 133 S.Ct. 1103) (February 20, 2013) (Justice Kagan)
  3. Bailey v. U.S., No. 11-770 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 186; 133 S.Ct. 1031) (February 19, 2013) (Justice Kennedy)
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USA, No. 11-1025 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 398; 133 S.Ct. 1138) (February 26, 2013) (Justice Alito)
  5. Moore v. Madigan, No. 12-1269 (7th Cir.) (708 F.3d 901) (February 22, 2013) (Per Curiam)
  6. Peterson v. Martinez, No. 11-1149 (10th Cir.) (707 F.3d 1`197) (February 22, 2013) (Judge Carlos Lucero)

More from these topics: