Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Johnson v. Williams, No. 11-465 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 289; 133 S.Ct. 1088) (February 20, 2013) (Justice Alito)

Loaded on March 18, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists March 18, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In another of a long line of decisions interpreting the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), the Supreme Court has once again chosen to adopt a rule of construction that most severely restricts the circumstances under which a Federal habeas court may grant relief to a state ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Johnson v. Williams, No. 11-465 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 289; 133 S.Ct. 1088) (February 20, 2013) (Justice Alito)
  2. Evans v. Michigan, No. 11-1327 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 313; 133 S.Ct. 1069) (February 20, 2013) (Justice Sotomayor)
  3. Henderson v. U.S., No. 11-9307 (U.S. Supreme Court) (568 U.S. 266; 133 S.Ct. 1121) (February 20, 2013) (Justice Breyer)
  4. Burt v. Titlow, No. 12-414 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 12; 134 S.Ct. 10) (November 5, 2013) (Justice Alito)
  5. U.S. v. Leitch, No. 11-CR-00609 (JG) (E.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (February 28, 2013) (Judge John Gleeson)
  6. U.S. v. Cotterman, No. 09-10139 (9th Cir.) (709 F.3d 952) (March 8, 2013) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)
  7. U.S. v. Duris, No. 11-cr-573 (E.D.Pa.) (881 F.Supp.2d 675) (August 1, 2012) (Judge Magistrate)

More from these topics: