Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Wurie, No. 11-1792 (1st Cir.) (728 F.3d 1) (May 17, 2013) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)

Loaded on May 27, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists May 27, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

This is an extremely important Fourth Amendment decision in which the Court was required to decide “whether the police, after seizing a cell phone from an individual's person as part of his lawful arrest, can search the phone's data without a warrant” - an issue that neither the First Circuit ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Blewett, No. 12-5226 (6th Cir.) (719 F.3d 482) (May 17, 2013) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
  2. Metrish v. Lancaster, No. 12-547 (U.S. Supreme Court) (569 U.S. 351; 133 S.Ct. 1781) (May 30, 2013) (Justice Ginsburg)
  3. U.S. v. Wurie, No. 11-1792 (1st Cir.) (728 F.3d 1) (May 17, 2013) (Judge Norman H. Stahl)
  4. U.S. v. Zavala-Marti, No. 11-1283 (1st Cir.) (715 F.3d 44) (May 13, 2013) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)
  5. U.S. v. Ciavarella, No. 11-3277 (3rd Cir.) (716 F.3d 705) (May 24, 2013) (Judge Julio M. Fuentes)

More from these topics: