Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Kriesel, No. 11-30197 (9th Cir.) (720 F.3d 1137) (June 28, 2013) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)

Loaded on Sept. 23, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists September 23, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Rule 41(g).

This is a fascinating decision that addresses one aspect of the Government’s perpetual accretion of power at the expense of privacy rights - and the courts’ virtually automatic acceptance of such Governmental power-grabs. A cogent and apt description of the issues addressed by the Court in this case are set ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Richards, No. 12-2790 (7th Cir.) (719 F.3d 746) (June 14, 2013) (Judge Joel L. Flaum)
  2. U.S. v. Hampton, No. 10-3074 (D.C. Cir.) (718 F.3d 978) (June 25, 2013) (Judge A. Raymond Randolph)
  3. U.S. v. Kriesel, No. 11-30197 (9th Cir.) (720 F.3d 1137) (June 28, 2013) (Judge Mary M. Schroeder)
  4. U.S. v. Engelmann, No. 12-1343 (8th Cir.) (720 F.3d 1005) (July 30, 2013) (Judge Bobby E. Shepherd)
  5. U.S. v. Tavera, No. 11-6175 (6th Cir.) (719 F.3d 705) (May 1, 2013) (Judge Gilbert S. Merritt)
  6. U.S. v. Sedaghaty, No. 11-30342 (9th Cir.) (728 F.3d 885) (August 23, 2013) (Judge M. Margaret McKeown)

More from these topics: