Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Phillips, No. 11-3822 (7th Cir.) (731 F.3d 649) (September 4, 2013) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

Loaded on Sept. 9, 2013 published in Punch and Jurists September 09, 2013
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, For the Purpose of Influencing.

The defendants in this case, Lacey Phillips (a hairdresser) and Erin Hall (a barber) decided to buy a house together. They applied to Associated Bank for a mortgage loan; but it said no, because Hall had a recent bankruptcy and the couple's joint income (approximately $3,800 a month) was too ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Haynes, No. 12-626-cr (2nd Cir.) (729 F.3d 178) (September 5, 2013) (Judge John G. Koeltl)
  2. U.S. v. Doe, No. XX-XXXX (6th Cir.) (731 F.3d 518) (August 27, 2013) (Judge Damon J. Keith)
  3. U.S. v. Johnson, No. 12-3811 (6th Cir.) (2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 17266) (August 20, 2013) (Judge Damon J. Keith)
  4. U.S. v. Phillips, No. 11-3822 (7th Cir.) (731 F.3d 649) (September 4, 2013) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  5. U.S. v. McQueen, No. 12-10840 (11th Cir.) (727 F.3d 1144) (August 22, 2013) (Judge Stanley Marcus)

More from these topics: