Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Fernandez v. California, No. 12-7822 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 972; 134 S.Ct. 1126) (February 25, 2014) (Justice Alito)

Loaded on April 28, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists March 10, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Consent.

In Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 122-23 (2006), a divided Supreme Court held that the police cannot enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant where one occupant agrees to the search but the other occupant refuses permission, stating that “a physically present inhabitant’s express refusal of consent ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Maynard, No. 12-5106 (2nd Cir.) (743 F.3d 374) (February 24, 2014) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
  2. Fernandez v. California, No. 12-7822 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 972; 134 S.Ct. 1126) (February 25, 2014) (Justice Alito)
  3. Kaley v. U.S., No. 12-464 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 320; 134 S.Ct. 1090) (February 25, 2014) (Justice Kagan)
  4. U.S. v. Adorno, No. 12-CR-611 (NG) (S.D.N.Y.) (950 F.Supp.2d 426) (May 24, 2013) (Judge Nina Gershon)
  5. Aamer v. Obama, No. 13-5223 (D.C. Cir.) (742 F.3d 1023) (February 11, 2014) (Judge David S. Tatel)
  6. Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 (9th Cir.) (742 F.3d 1144) (February 13, 2014) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
  7. U.S. v. Archuleta, No. 12-2026 (10th Cir.) (737 F.3d 1287) (December 17, 2013) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)

More from these topics: