Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Fernandez v. California, No. 12-7822 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 972; 134 S.Ct. 1126) (February 25, 2014) (Justice Alito)

Loaded on April 28, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists March 10, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Consent.

In Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 122-23 (2006), a divided Supreme Court held that the police cannot enter a home and seize evidence without a warrant where one occupant agrees to the search but the other occupant refuses permission, stating that “a physically present inhabitant’s express refusal of consent …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Maynard, No. 12-5106 (2nd Cir.) (743 F.3d 374) (February 24, 2014) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
  2. Kaley v. U.S., No. 12-464 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 320; 134 S.Ct. 1090) (February 25, 2014) (Justice Kagan)
  3. Fernandez v. California, No. 12-7822 (U.S. Supreme Court) (571 U.S. 972; 134 S.Ct. 1126) (February 25, 2014) (Justice Alito)
  4. Aamer v. Obama, No. 13-5223 (D.C. Cir.) (742 F.3d 1023) (February 11, 2014) (Judge David S. Tatel)
  5. U.S. v. Archuleta, No. 12-2026 (10th Cir.) (737 F.3d 1287) (December 17, 2013) (Judge Mary Beck Briscoe)
  6. Peruta v. County of San Diego, No. 10-56971 (9th Cir.) (742 F.3d 1144) (February 13, 2014) (Judge Diarmuid F. O'Scannlain)
  7. U.S. v. Adorno, No. 12-CR-611 (NG) (S.D.N.Y.) (950 F.Supp.2d 426) (May 24, 2013) (Judge Nina Gershon)

More from these topics: