Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Paroline v. U.S., No. 12-8561 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 434; 134 S.Ct. 1710) (April 23, 2014) (Justice Kennedy)

Loaded on April 28, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists April 28, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

This decision finally resolved (at least in part) a growing, and increasingly contentious, divide among the lower courts over the correct interpretation of 18 U.S.C. § 2259, a component of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994. That confusing and confused statute requires district courts to order defendants convicted of …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Freeman, No. 12-4636 (4th Cir.) (741 F.3d 426) (January 17, 2014) (Judge Stephanie Dawn Thacker)
  2. U.S. v. Benns, No. 12-51038 (5th Cir.) (740 F.3d 370) (January 21, 2014) (Judge James E. Jr. Graves)
  3. White v. Woodall, No. 12-794 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 415; 134 S.Ct. 1697) (April 23, 2014) (Justice Scalia)
  4. Navarette v. California, No. 12-9490 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 393; 134 S.Ct. 1683) (April 22, 2014) (Justice Thomas)
  5. Paroline v. U.S., No. 12-8561 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 434; 134 S.Ct. 1710) (April 23, 2014) (Justice Kennedy)
  6. Rosemond v. U.S., No. 12-895 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 65; 134 S.Ct. 1240) (March 5, 2014) (Justice Kagan)
  7. U.S. v. Castleman, No. 12-1371 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 157; 134 S.Ct. 1405) (March 26, 2014) (Justice Sotomayor)

More from these topics: