Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Robers, No. 12-9012 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 639; 134 S.Ct. 1854) (May 5, 2014) (Justice Breyer)

Loaded on April 28, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists June 02, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

This case involves the correct interpretation of a clumsy and abstruse provision of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA) which provides that, in the case of a crime “resulting in damage to or loss or destruction of property of a victim,” restitution is mandatory; and that the sentencing ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Thomas v. Holder, No. 12-5228 (D.C. Cir.) (750 F.3d 899) (May 6, 2014) (Judge David S. Tatel)
  2. Markadonatos v. Village of Woodridge, No. 12-2619 (7th Cir.) (739 F.3d 984) (January 8, 2014) (Judge Joseph P. Stadtmueller)
  3. U.S. v. Preston, No. 11-10511 (9th Cir.) (751 F.3d 1008) (May 12, 2014) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon)
  4. Hall v. Florida, No. 12-10882 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 701; 134 S.Ct. 1986) (May 27, 2014) (Justice Kennedy)
  5. U.S. v. Robers, No. 12-9012 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 639; 134 S.Ct. 1854) (May 5, 2014) (Justice Breyer)
  6. Martinez v. Illinois, No. 13-5967 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 833; 134 S.Ct. 2070) (May 27, 2014) (Per Curiam)
  7. Plumhoff v. Rickard, No. 12-1117 (U.S. Supreme Court) (572 U.S. 765; 134 S.Ct. 2012) (May 27, 2014) (Justice Alito)

More from these topics: