Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Flores-Mejia, No. 12-3149 (3rd Cir.) (759 F.3d 253) (July 16, 2014) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

Loaded on July 28, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists July 28, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Preservation of Issues.

Overruling its decision in U.S. v. Sevilla, 541 F.3d 226 (3d Cir. Sept. 4, 2008), a divided Third Circuit, sitting en banc, held that a procedural error at sentencing is preserved only if a party objects after sentence is imposed or at the time that the procedural error becomes evident. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Markadonatos v. Village of Woodridge,, No. 12-2619 (7th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (July 21, 2014) (Per Curiam)
  2. U.S. v. Kopstein, No. 13-417-cr (2nd Cir.) (759 F.3d 168) (July 21, 2014) (Judge Dennis G. Jacobs)
  3. Bahlul v. U.S., No. 11-1324 (D.C. Cir.) (767 F.3d 1) (July 14, 2014) (Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson)
  4. U.S. v. Sayer, No. 12-2489 (1st Cir.) (748 F.3d 425) (May 2, 2014) (Judge Sandra L. Lynch)
  5. U.S. v. Dayi, No. Crim. No. JKB-13-0012 (D.Md.) (980 F.Supp.2d 682) (November 1, 2013) (Judge James K. Bredar)
  6. U.S. v. Flores-Mejia, No. 12-3149 (3rd Cir.) (759 F.3d 253) (July 16, 2014) (Judge Jane R. Roth)

More from these topics: