Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Siegel, No. 13-1633 (7th Cir.) (753 F.3d 705) (May 29, 2014) (Judge Richard A. Posner)

Loaded on July 7, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists July 07, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Best Practices Guide.

In this decision, the Seventh Circuit took issue with the disturbing practice of too many sentencing judges who tend to impose indiscriminate, vague and sometimes pointless discretionary conditions of supervised release that have little, if anything, to with the statutory goals of sentencing as stated in 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a) ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Wooley, No. 12-31085 (5th Cir.) (740 F.3d 359) (January 21, 2014) (Judge James L. Dennis)
  2. U.S. v. Mohamud, No. 3:10-CR-00475-KI-1 (D.Or.) ( F.Supp.2d ) (June 24, 2014) (Judge Garr M. King)
  3. U.S. v. Siegel, No. 13-1633 (7th Cir.) (753 F.3d 705) (May 29, 2014) (Judge Richard A. Posner)
  4. Riley v. California, No. 13-132 (U.S. Supreme Court) (573 U.S. ___; 134 S.Ct. 2473) (June 25, 2014) (Justice (John G.) Roberts)
  5. Loughrin v. U.S., No. 13-316 (U.S. Supreme Court) (573 U.S. 351; 134 S.Ct. 2384) (June 23, 2014) (Justice Kagan)
  6. Latif v. Holder, No. 3:10-cv-00750-BR (D.Or.) (28 F.Supp.3d 1134) (June 24, 2014) (Judge Anna J. Brown)

More from these topics: