Georgia v. Randolph, No. 04-1067 (U.S. Supreme Court) (547 U.S. 103; 126 S.Ct. 1515) (March 22, 2006) (Justice Souter)
In U.S. v. Matlock, 415 U.S. 164 (1974), the Supreme Court held that the consent of one who possesses common authority over a premises or its effects is valid as against the absent, nonconsenting person with whom that authority is shared. In the instant case, the Court addressed a slightly ...
Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.
As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.
Already a subscriber? Login