Skip navigation

U.S. v. Rivera-Rodriguez, No. 11-1689 (1st Cir.) (761 F.3d 105) (August 4, 2014) (Judge Kermit A. Lipez)

Here the Court vacated a conviction because the district court had engaged in repeated “improper judicial intervention” by “taking on the prosecutor’s role” through hostile and prejudicial questioning of witnesses and by “unreasonable fact-finding”.

This is an important and instructive decision in which the First Circuit vacated the conviction of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login