Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Mackay, No. 13-10521 (5th Cir.) (757 F.3d 195) (June 26, 2014) (Judge Edward C. Prado)

Loaded on Oct. 6, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists October 06, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Rule 36.

In an era when some 96% of Federal criminal cases are resolved by guilty pleas rather than trials, the presentence report (“PSR”) has taken on outsized importance and, in many ways, has become one of the most important documents in the travels of any defendant through the criminal justice system. ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Smith, No. 13-2728 (8th Cir.) (756 F.3d 1070) (June 27, 2014) (Judge William J. Riley)
  2. U.S. v. Dreyer, No. 13-30077 (9th Cir.) (767 F.3d 826) (September 12, 2014) (Judge Marsha L. Berzon)
  3. U.S. v. Mackay, No. 13-10521 (5th Cir.) (757 F.3d 195) (June 26, 2014) (Judge Edward C. Prado)
  4. Mohamed v. Holder, No. 1:11-cv-50 (AJT/TRJ) (E.D.Va.) (995 F.Supp.2d 520) (January 22, 2014) (Judge Anthony J. Trenga)

More from these topics: