Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Erwin, No. 13-3407 (3rd Cir.) (765 F.3d 218) (August 26, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Chagares)

Loaded on Sept. 8, 2014 published in Punch and Jurists September 08, 2014
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In this ominous decision, the Third Circuit created a new draconian remedy to deal with defendants who attempt to appeal some aspect of their sentence after agreeing in their plea agreements to waive all their rights of appeal before they even know what the actual sentence will be. Essentially, the ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Coggins v. County of Nassau, No. 07-CV-3624 (JFB)(AKT) (E.D.N.Y.) (988 F.Supp.2d 231) (December 2, 2013) (Judge Joseph F. Bianco)
  2. U.S. v. Erwin, No. 13-3407 (3rd Cir.) (765 F.3d 218) (August 26, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Chagares)
  3. Colwell v. Bannister, No. 12-15844 (9th Cir.) (763 F.3d 1060) (August 14, 2014) (Judge Barry G. Silverman)
  4. U.S. v. Miller, No. 13-3177 (6th Cir.) (767 F.3d 585) (August 27, 2014) (Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton)
  5. U.S. v. Cole, No. 11-1232 (8th Cir.) (765 F.3d 884) (August 29, 2014) (Judge Bobby E. Shepherd)
  6. U.S. v. Saafir, No. 13-4049 (4th Cir.) (754 F.3d 262) (June 11, 2014) (Per Curiam)

More from these topics: