Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Gladding, No. 12-10544 (9th Cir.) (775 F.3d 1149) (December 31, 2014) (Judge Carlos T. Bea)

Loaded on Jan. 19, 2015 published in Punch and Jurists January 19, 2015
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Rule 41(g).

This is an important and well-written decision that contains an excellent summary of the state of the law on the rights of a criminal defendant under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) to seek the return of property seized by the Government - an event that probably happens hundreds of times a day all ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Katzin, No. 12-2548 (3rd Cir.) (769 F.3d 163) (October 1, 2014) (Judge Franklin S. Van Antwerpen)
  2. U.S. v. Gladding, No. 12-10544 (9th Cir.) (775 F.3d 1149) (December 31, 2014) (Judge Carlos T. Bea)

More from these topics: