Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

Yates v. U.S., No. 13-7451 (U.S. Supreme Court) (574 U.S. ___; 135 S.Ct. 1074) (February 25, 2015) (Justice Ginsburg)

Loaded on June 29, 2015 published in Punch and Jurists March 02, 2015
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, "tangible objects".

Some day philosophers will probably look back at this decision and, with great mirth, debate who was sillier:

-- the avaricious prosecutors for attempting to prosecute a fisherman under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, a high-penalty statute that was undeniably “designed to protect investors and restore trust in the financial ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Yates v. U.S., No. 13-7451 (U.S. Supreme Court) (574 U.S. ___; 135 S.Ct. 1074) (February 25, 2015) (Justice Ginsburg)
  2. U.S. v. Nieves-Velez, No. Crim. No. 10-244 (PG) (D.Puerto Rico) (28 F.Supp.3d 131) (June 26, 2014) (Judge Juan M. Perez-Gimenez)
  3. Reid v. Donelan, No. 13-cv-30125-MAP (D.Mass.) (22 F.Supp.3d 84) (May 27, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Ponsor)
  4. Matter of Black Iphone 4, No. Magistrate Case No. 14-235 (JMF) (D.D.C.) (27 F.Supp.3d 74) (March 11, 2014) (Judge Magistrate)
  5. Suarez v. Holder, No. 1:14-CV-968 (M.D.Pa.) ( F.Supp.3d ) (February 18, 2015) (Judge William W. Caldwell)
  6. U.S. v. Winn, No. 14-cr-30169-NJR (S.D.Ill.) ( F.Supp.3d ) (February 9, 2015) (Judge Nancy J. Rosenstengel)

More from these topics: