Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Erwin, No. 13-3407 (3rd Cir.) (779 F.3d 620) (December 31, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Chagares)

Loaded on March 23, 2015 published in Punch and Jurists March 23, 2015
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In the 09/08/14 issue of P&J, we noted a remarkable and ominous panel decision from the Third Circuit in which the Court created a new draconian remedy to deal with defendants who attempt to appeal some aspect of their sentence after agreeing in their plea agreements to waive some of ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Reeves v. King, No. 13-3416 (8th Cir.) (774 F.3d 439) (December 16, 2013) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)
  2. U.S. v. Medina, No. 13-1936 (1st Cir.) (779 F.3d 55) (March 4, 2015) (Judge David J. Barron)
  3. Whiteside v. U.S., No. 13-7152 (4th Cir.) (775 F.3d 180) (December 19, 2014) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkinson)
  4. U.S. v. Foreste, No. 13-4880 (2nd Cir.) (780 F.3d 518) (March 11, 2015) (Judge Richard C. Wesley)
  5. U.S. v. Robinson, No. 13-2308 (6th Cir.) (778 F.3d 515) (February 18, 2015) (Judge Eric L. Clay)
  6. U.S. v. Erwin, No. 13-3407 (3rd Cir.) (779 F.3d 620) (December 31, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Chagares)

More from these topics: