Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Erwin, No. 13-3407 (3rd Cir.) (779 F.3d 620) (December 31, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Chagares)

Loaded on March 23, 2015 published in Punch and Jurists March 23, 2015
Filed under: Punch And Jurists.

In the 09/08/14 issue of P&J, we noted a remarkable and ominous panel decision from the Third Circuit in which the Court created a new draconian remedy to deal with defendants who attempt to appeal some aspect of their sentence after agreeing in their plea agreements to waive some of …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Erwin, No. 13-3407 (3rd Cir.) (779 F.3d 620) (December 31, 2014) (Judge Michael A. Chagares)
  2. U.S. v. Robinson, No. 13-2308 (6th Cir.) (778 F.3d 515) (February 18, 2015) (Judge Eric L. Clay)
  3. U.S. v. Foreste, No. 13-4880 (2nd Cir.) (780 F.3d 518) (March 11, 2015) (Judge Richard C. Wesley)
  4. Whiteside v. U.S., No. 13-7152 (4th Cir.) (775 F.3d 180) (December 19, 2014) (Judge William W. Jr. Wilkinson)
  5. U.S. v. Medina, No. 13-1936 (1st Cir.) (779 F.3d 55) (March 4, 2015) (Judge David J. Barron)
  6. Reeves v. King, No. 13-3416 (8th Cir.) (774 F.3d 439) (December 16, 2013) (Judge Kermit Edward Bye)

More from these topics: