Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Burns, No. 13-5045 (10th Cir.) (775 F.3d 1221) (December 30, 2014) (Judge Robert E. Bacharach)

Loaded on May 4, 2015 published in Punch and Jurists May 04, 2015
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right of Famial Association.

This case highlights the rank absurdity of the all-too-common judicial practice of rote impositions of just about any special conditions of supervised release that sound tough- even if they lack any legal or factual justification whatsoever.

In this case, James Burns was convicted of possession and attempted possession of child …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Hill, No. 13-4806 (4th Cir.) (776 F.3d 243) (January 13, 2015) (Judge Albert Diaz)
  2. U.S. v. Ahmed, No. 12-cr-661 (E.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.3d ) (April 28, 2015) (Judge Sandra Townes)
  3. U.S. v. Burns, No. 13-5045 (10th Cir.) (775 F.3d 1221) (December 30, 2014) (Judge Robert E. Bacharach)
  4. U.S. v. Torres-Perez, No. 14-10154 (5th Cir.) (777 F.3d 764) (January 29, 2015) (Judge James E. Jr. Graves)
  5. U.S. v. Baines, No. 13-3284 (7th Cir.) (777 F.3d 959) (February 9, 2015) (Judge William J. Bauer)
  6. Rodriguez v. U.S., No. 13-9972 (U.S. Supreme Court) (575 U.S. ___; 135 S.Ct. 1609) (April 21, 2015) (Justice Ginsburg)

More from these topics: