Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Burns, No. 13-5045 (10th Cir.) (775 F.3d 1221) (December 30, 2014) (Judge Robert E. Bacharach)

Loaded on May 4, 2015 published in Punch and Jurists May 04, 2015
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Right of Famial Association.

This case highlights the rank absurdity of the all-too-common judicial practice of rote impositions of just about any special conditions of supervised release that sound tough- even if they lack any legal or factual justification whatsoever.

In this case, James Burns was convicted of possession and attempted possession of child ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. U.S. v. Hill, No. 13-4806 (4th Cir.) (776 F.3d 243) (January 13, 2015) (Judge Albert Diaz)
  2. Rodriguez v. U.S., No. 13-9972 (U.S. Supreme Court) (575 U.S. ___; 135 S.Ct. 1609) (April 21, 2015) (Justice Ginsburg)
  3. U.S. v. Baines, No. 13-3284 (7th Cir.) (777 F.3d 959) (February 9, 2015) (Judge William J. Bauer)
  4. U.S. v. Torres-Perez, No. 14-10154 (5th Cir.) (777 F.3d 764) (January 29, 2015) (Judge James E. Jr. Graves)
  5. U.S. v. Burns, No. 13-5045 (10th Cir.) (775 F.3d 1221) (December 30, 2014) (Judge Robert E. Bacharach)
  6. U.S. v. Ahmed, No. 12-cr-661 (E.D.N.Y.) ( F.Supp.3d ) (April 28, 2015) (Judge Sandra Townes)

More from these topics: