Skip navigation

U.S. v. Mercado-Flores, No. Crim.No. 14-466 (GAG) (D.Puerto Rico) ( F.Supp.3d ) (June 4, 2015) (Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi)

This is an interesting decision that proves the wisdom of always reading the statute under which your client has been indicted. Here, because of a statutory omission, a defendant who pled guilty to transporting an individual with the intent to engage in criminal sexual activity, had his conviction vacated because ...

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login