Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Sakoc, No. 2;13-CR-106 (D.Vt.) (115 F.Supp.3d 475) (June 30, 2016) (Judge William K. III Sessions)

Loaded on May 9, 2016 published in Punch and Jurists May 09, 2016
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Core of Criminality.

This is a rare decision in which a Federal judge actually granted a defendant’s motion for a new trial based on a constructive amendment of his indictment that occurred because Government introduced new evidence at trial and new theories of criminality during summation, which “were substantially different from the core …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Ocasio v. U.S., No. 14-361 (U.S. Supreme Court) (578 U.S. ___; 136 S.Ct. 1423) (May 2, 2016) (Judge Samuel A. Jr. Alito)
  2. U.S. v. Foster, No. 14-20323-CR (S.D.Fla.) (103 F.Supp.3d 1335) (April 16, 2015) (Judge Cecilia M Altonaga)
  3. U.S. v. Buffis, No. Crim. No. 13-30028-MGM (D.Mass.) (2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 162222) (April 20, 2016) (Judge Mark G. Mastroianni)
  4. U.S. v. Cortes-Medina, No. 14-1101 (1st Cir.) (819 F.3d 566) (May 12, 2016) (Judge Bruce M. Selya)
  5. U.S. v. Sakoc, No. 2;13-CR-106 (D.Vt.) (115 F.Supp.3d 475) (June 30, 2016) (Judge William K. III Sessions)
  6. U.S. v. Maymi-Maysonet, No. 14-2183 (1st Cir.) (812 F.3d 233) (February 5, 2016) (Judge Michael Daly Hawkins)
  7. U.S. v. Abney, No. 14-3074 (D.C. Cir.) (812 F.3d 1079) (February 5, 2016) (Judge Judith W. Rogers)

More from these topics: