Skip navigation
Punch and Jurists

U.S. v. Batamula, No. 12-20630 (5th Cir.) (823 F.3d 237) (May 3, 2012) (Per Curiam)

Loaded on Sept. 5, 2016 published in Punch and Jurists September 05, 2016
Filed under: Punch And Jurists, Post Padilla v. Kentucky.

In U.S. v. Batamula, 788 F.3d 611 (5th Cir. June 2, 2015) (“Batamula I”) (P&J, 06/15/15), a panel from the Fifth Circuit issued a notable ruling about the survival of claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under the rule laid down in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010). In …

 

Full article and associated cases available to subscribers.

As a digital subscriber to Punch and Jurists, you can access full text and downloads for this and other premium content.

Subscribe today

Already a subscriber? Login

More from this issue:

  1. Does v. Snyder, No. 15-1536 (6th Cir.) (834 F.3d 696) (August 25, 2017) (Judge Alice M. Batchelder)
  2. D.E. v. Doe, No. 15-2128 (6th Cir.) (834 F.3d 723) (August 25, 2016) (Judge John M. Rogers)
  3. Arias v. Lynch, No. 14-2839 (7th Cir.) ( F.3d ) (August 24, 2016) (Judge Clyde H. Hamilton)
  4. Garcia v. Montgomery County, Maryland, No. Civil Action No. TDC-12-3592 (D.Md.) (145 F.Supp.3d 492) (November 5, 2015) (Judge Theodore D. Chuang)
  5. U.S. v. Batamula, No. 12-20630 (5th Cir.) (823 F.3d 237) (May 3, 2012) (Per Curiam)
  6. U.S. v. Ford, No. 15-1303 (1st Cir.) (821 F.3d 63) (April 13, 2016) (Judge William J. Jr. Kayatta)

More from these topics: